Page 13 - ATHM26_4

Table 5. Frequency of injury causes in two groups of Table 9. Frequency of CT scans problems in both silymarin
silymarin and control in detail and control groups

Number (%) Number (%)
Variable group Silymarin Control P Value Variable group Silymarin Control P Value
Type of Car overturning 7(8/2) 8(2/3) .18 CT Normal 20(50) 7(8/2) .002
injury Car crash with pedestrian 17(8/6) 10(25) scan Multiple contusion in the 2(5) 0(0)
Truck crash 2(5) 5(2) result right frontal
Car crash with car 0(0) 2(5) contusion in the left 2(5) 0(0)
Engine crash with engine 3(2/1) 3(2/1) frontotemporal
Engine crash by car 3(2/1) 4(6/1) contusion in the left basal 1(4/0) 0(0)
ganglion
Pouring oars in the well 2(5) 2(5) TSAH and mild contusion 1(4/0) 0(0)
Fall from height 5(2) 0(0) in the right frontal
Fall from the mountain 1(4/0) 1(4/0) SAH – left temporal 4(6/1) 2(5)
with a tube parietal
Motorcycle Accident with 0(0) 2(5)
Pedestrian contusion in the Corpus 2(5) 0(0)
Callosum
Bike crash with car 0(0) 2(5) Contusions and SAH 2(5) 0(0)
Fall from the stairs 0(0) 1(4/0) several
Bullet 0(0) 1(4/0) ICH in the right basal gan- 0(0) 3(2/1)
Total 40(100) 40(100) glia
SAH- contusion in the right 0(0) 3(2/1)
There was no significant difference between the two groups. temporal
Right temporal epidural 0(0) 2(5)
Table 6. Frequency of the incident in two groups of TSAH 0(0) 3(2/1)
silymarin and control Frontal contusion 0(0) 1(4/0)
TSAH- Deep contusion in 0(0) 2(5)
the left temporal
Number (%) TSH-SAH- contusion 0(0) 2(5)
Variable group Silymarin Control P Value
Avenue 13(2/5) 12(8/4) .47 TSAH and contusion in the 0(0) 2(5)
left occipital
Road 19(6/7) 23(2/9)
Place of Contusion in the brainstem 0(0) 2(5)
incident Workplace 4(6/1) 4(6/1) Surface and deep contusion 0(0) 2(5)
Home 2(5) 1(4/0) several
Mountain 2(5) 0(0) Contusion of left temporal 0(0) 2(5)
and epidural hematoma
There was no significant difference between the two groups. Contusion of left temporal 0(0) 1(4/0)
and left frontal epidural
Table 7. Frequency of desirable traumatic outcome in two SDH- Anterior 0(0) 1(4/0)
Interhumorophyte
groups of silymarin and control And deep contusion IVH 0(0) 1(4/0)
SDH 0(0) 2(5)
Number (%) IVH in the side ventricle 0(0) 1(4/0)
Variable group Silymarin Control P Value Contusion of left parietal 0(0) 1(4/0)
Desirable Full recovery 8(2/3) 7(8/2) and brain stem
traumatic outcome Moderate Inability 13(2/5) 15(6) .40
There was significant difference between the two groups.
There was no significant difference between the two groups.

Table 8. Frequency of undesirable traumatic outcome in
two groups of silymarin and control

Number (%)
Variable group Silymarin Control P Value
Traumatic Severe inability 9(6/3) 7(8/2) .12
adverse Vegetable coma 4(6/1) 9(6/3)
reaction Death 6(4/2) 2(5)

There was no significant difference between the two groups.

Nazemi Rafi—Silymarine Effects on Prognosis of TBI ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES, JUL/AUG 2020 VOL. 26 NO. 4 11